Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Any information related to prospecting

Moderators: russau, Leonard

Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby russau » Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:59 pm

goto : http://www.blm.gov/co/st/en/fo/rgfo/min ... creek.html the BLM is wanting to redo the rules there plus charge a fee. Please leave your comment for them.
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Hoser John » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:53 am

:? The significent increase in camping is causing extensive enviromental damage so they want/may/can/will ban all forms of mining??? Must be a GPAA claim there-John
Hoser John
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:42 am
Location: Redding Kalif

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Joe S (AK) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:19 pm

John, John, John ---

It's the BLM, remember - *B*L*M* *!*!*!* :roll: :o :roll: :o :roll: :o

We believe ... , We have heard ... , It's obvious that ... , Everyone knows ... and It's a well known fact that ... , There is no question that ... .

Just more of your tax money "at work".

Joe
Wiser Mining Through Many, Many Personal Mistakes (OOPS, "Personal Learning Situations")
User avatar
Joe S (AK)
 
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:03 pm
Location: Alaska except for winters in Northern Idaho

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby russau » Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:24 pm

very good observation Joe! :D
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Hoser John » Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:27 am

Yep -AT WORK....putting honest miners ...OUT OF WORK...then they no longer HAVE TO DO ANY WORK sic sic sic :? John
Hoser John
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:42 am
Location: Redding Kalif

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Ornery Cuss » Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:18 pm

I like the part that says "The land was acquired, it is not covered under the 1872 mining law" what a bunch of sheite.....
I'd bet this would loose in court, it wouldn't be in my life time if ya started now however, I'm 57yo.

its a concerted effort to keep miners out of known mineral bearing areas, and talking what the goberment thinks belongs to them.
They know where its at, and know it aint goin nowhere, they would have the resources to go after it if needed. :twisted:


OC
So much river...So little time
User avatar
Ornery Cuss
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Gold Seeker » Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:53 pm

Ornery Cuss wrote:I like the part that says "The land was acquired, it is not covered under the 1872 mining law" what a bunch of sheite.....
I'd bet this would loose in court, it wouldn't be in my life time if ya started now however, I'm 57yo.

its a concerted effort to keep miners out of known mineral bearing areas, and talking what the goberment thinks belongs to them.
They know where its at, and know it aint goin nowhere, they would have the resources to go after it if needed. :twisted:


OC


Here east of the Mississippi all of the "pubic" land, e.g. National Parks, National Forests, etc. are acquired lands, meaning that it was once privately owned land that was bought from the private land owners and in some cases you might as well say taken by the government to turn into these public lands, and as such aren't covered under the 1872 Mining Laws.

If Cache Creek was at one time privately owned the the same would apply I guess.
Skip P.

God, Family, Friends, and Gold!!!
User avatar
Gold Seeker
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby Hoser John » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:17 am

Back in the late 60 the feds took over half my Uncles claim,put hiway 49 right smack dab through the middle of it. They blew up 2 tunnels AND blew up General John Freemonts(Founder of calif) original historical rock cabin too. Total payment was $32..... :shock: bureauratz at work sic sic sic -John
Hoser John
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:42 am
Location: Redding Kalif

Re: Public comment needed for BLM: Cache Creek

Postby nebraskadad » Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:08 am

Hoser John wrote::? The significent increase in camping is causing extensive enviromental damage so they want/may/can/will ban all forms of mining??? Must be a GPAA claim there-John


John,

the GPOC has a contract for managing the area, their group is largely the ones who camp there. I do know there are people that park campers in the area..
User avatar
nebraskadad
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:15 pm


Return to General Prospecting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron