House demands title to federal lands

Politically oriented information, blasts, kudo's for politician’s (probably won't be many of those)

Moderators: russau, Leonard

House demands title to federal lands

Postby gremlin » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:21 am

dang some thing is going on that seems to be a good thing.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/51349 ... .html.csp#
The House endorsed a not-so-modest proposal on Wednesday: It called for Congress to give Utah the right, title and jurisdiction over the 22.6 million acres in its boundaries that are now overseen by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

That is about two times more than the 11.5 million acres of private land in the state.

Rep. Roger Barrus, R-Centerville, introduced HJR39, which the House passed on a 61-9 vote and sent to the Senate. It demands that Utah be given that land because of mismanagement by federal officials and contends that the law that made Utah a state promised to sell that land into private ownership.

"We have suffered injury," Barrus said. "We call on Congress to revisit how public lands are being managed by the BLM."

Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, said Barrus is misreading the law that created Utah and said the federal government never required itself to sell off public lands in Utah. He said it would be wiser for Utah to negotiate for better treatment of public lands rather than pass such resolutions.

Barrus said, however, that Utah was promised sovereignty over its areas, and as long as the federal government has "control of two-thirds of the land mass of the state, we will not have that kind of sovereignty
save a tree, eat a squirrel.
gremlin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: House demands title to federal lands

Postby dickb » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:01 pm

I think that would kill the 1872 mining law in that state, since it was no longer public land owned by the Feds. Then the state would be able to enact it's own regulations for it's use and collect what ever fees that it deemed needed to be collected.

Anybody else want to comment?

Dickb
78 Retired and Free
Eastern Iowa
User avatar
dickb
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:27 am
Location: E. Iowa

Re: House demands title to federal lands

Postby russau » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:20 pm

yep, kinda like they do now!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: House demands title to federal lands

Postby cowboy444 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:37 pm

dickb wrote:I think that would kill the 1872 mining law in that state, since it was no longer public land owned by the Feds. Then the state would be able to enact it's own regulations for it's use and collect what ever fees that it deemed needed to be collected.

Anybody else want to comment?

Dickb


Public land IS NOT owned by the federal government. It is owned by you and me. We just ain't paying attention into how the federal government is managing OUR land. It's time to FIRE the lot.

cowboy444
User avatar
cowboy444
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:49 pm

Re: House demands title to federal lands

Postby russau » Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:23 am

yep! probly waaaaaay past time todo so!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: House demands title to federal lands

Postby gremlin » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:49 pm

its been past time. i wonder what there really trying to do. they mite be trying to tell congress that its the publics land and your miss managing it. we do need more on what is going on.
save a tree, eat a squirrel.
gremlin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:05 pm


Return to Political

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron