PLP v SB 670 MOTION TO DISMISS REPLY

[Gold Seeker]

Ic4wd,

They never had any evidence showing that dredging was detrimental, they used hearsay/rumors speculation, scratching each other's backs, and money to get SB670 passed, the way the environmentalist have always done!!!


Skip

[old gold miner]

wasn't SB 670 passed because the legislature supposedly had evidence to find that the dredging was detrimental?? Where is a copy of the "evidence" they had to back their actions?

thanks

That is exactly why the URGENCY FINDING of SB 670 is both illogical & illegal. It is premised on a CEQA study that has not, nor may ever be completed. To make an URGENCY finding, based on something that does not yet exist is illogical. It makes no sense, as it is not premised on sound scientific evidence, or any rational evidence, for that matter.