New Merury Study 2011

Politically oriented information, blasts, kudo's for politician’s (probably won't be many of those)

Moderators: russau, Leonard

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby digger pat » Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:52 am

They only tested one stretch of river. How many rivers are there in the state? They cannot possibly get the same results from a different river. Its obvious that special interest is buying their results. But, why not close one section of river instead of the entire state?
I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed....seems like the equivalent to killing the entire states deer population because one has cronic wasting disease.
digger pat
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:36 am

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby russau » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:34 am

wacoenviromentalists pursueing their dream of lies coming true! and getting the dem. party to repay them for their lies and votes!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby jason » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:32 pm

I didnt quite understand it all but storms and heavy run off create the same effect right? Instead of banning altogether(because its harder to reverse a ban in the future) how about just dredge during stormy seasons???
jason
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby russau » Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:41 am

greedy pigs want all they see and then want more. they are on a roll now and everyone will feel their bite!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby gremlin » Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:10 pm

looks like the epa is going to get there fingers in to the water co biz.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/epa-adm ... ng-drin-0#

EPA Administrator Claims Regulating Drinking Water Supply Prevents Kids from Getting Autism
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson told a Senate panel that preventing children from being exposed to contaminated water could spare them from autism.

Jackson made the remark on Wednesday at a hearing of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works in response to questioning by Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), who asked if a recent executive order by President Barack Obama about regulations and the regulatory process means that the EPA can put any rules in place if “the benefits outweigh the costs.”

“I think the president’s far-reaching executive order makes clear that there are some things that are hard to price,” Jackson said at the hearing on U.S. drinking water and new regulations the EPA may put in place on contaminants.
save a tree, eat a squirrel.
gremlin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: New Merury Study 2011

Postby rivraton » Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:25 pm

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/epa-administrator-claims-regulating-drin-0#

EPA Administrator Claims Regulating Drinking Water Supply Prevents Kids from Getting Autism
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson told a Senate panel that preventing children from being exposed to contaminated water could spare them from autism.


If drinking water causes autism, why dosen't everyone have autism? :roll:
User avatar
rivraton
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:15 pm
Location: California

Previous

Return to Political

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests