Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Any information related to prospecting

Moderators: russau, Leonard

Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Plumas » Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:00 pm

“There was a good reason why the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office had a large presence at the Almanor Basin Tea Party Patriots meeting,” Sheriff Greg Hagwood said Feb. 10.

He said he and his administration, along with the area patrol sergeant Dean Canalia and Chester deputies Ian James and Chris Herrbach, were there to “demonstrate first and foremost their awareness of what the United States Forest Service was trying to inflict on residents and tourists alike with restricting access to public lands.”

“Secondly, I want every citizen to know we do not support, endorse nor will we inflict this one-vehicle limit nonsense on them,” Hagwood said.

“Bottom line, we are not going to be agents of the federal government in creating a new class of criminals who are doing nothing more then accessing what are public lands.”

—Greg Hagwood, Plumas County Sheriff

The referenced one-vehicle limit is a rule being proposed that would limit persons pulling trailers or gathering firewood to being able to only move their vehicle off the roadway a distance equal to the measured length of their personal vehicle(s).

He then spoke about all the laws, rules and regulations the USFS already has in place to protect the forest.

“I will be damned if my staff will start inflicting these latest federal mandates on law-abiding citizens who are doing nothing more then enjoying what should continue to be recognized as public lands,” Hagwood said.

He also talked about road access for snowmobile, off-highway vehicle and woodcutting use.

“I see this as the beginning of an effort to restrict and inhibit access to public lands. Just because those uses are not targeted today does not mean they won’t be tomorrow,” he said. “At some point this nonsense has got to stop.”

He said there are already numerous laws that address resource damage and irresponsible behavior on pubic lands and in the forest.

“There are ample laws to address those issues now. The Plumas County Sheriff’s Office will not be citing, arresting, seizing vehicles of residents who have driven 30 yards off the roadway to collect firewood,” he said.

According to the proposed rule, persons who drive off the roadway will be in violation of the USFS Travel Management Plan and subject to punitive measures.

“No one supports damages to resources or the environment but we have to get to a point where political correctness takes a back seat to common sense,” Hagwood said.

“I was elected to protect the rights of our citizens and I take this duty seriously. I believe my stand (is) in keeping with the general sentiment of the people of Plumas County and the employees of the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office.

“It’s a shame that we have come to recognize the seriousness this late in the game — better late then never. People are beginning to recognize the infringement on their liberties and I applaud those who are waking up and taking action.”

As for his stand on the issue, Hagwood said, “I think it’s essential people in Plumas County understand that as important as enforcing laws are, of equal importance is our job to ensure people’s liberties and freedoms.”

Looking at others in attendance at the Almanor Basin Tea Party Patriots meeting Feb. 8, it was obvious Hagwood is not alone in his sentiments.

Present from Lassen County were Sheriff Dean Growden and county supervisors Bob Pyle and Larry Wosick. Sheriff John Evans traveled over from Sierra County.

Plumas County supervisors Sherrie Thrall and Terry Swofford also attended the meeting.

Moving up to the state and national level: representatives were in the audience from the offices of Assemblyman Dan Logue and Congressmen Wally Herger and Tom McClintock.

It was anticipated that the following government offices were viewing the meeting from outside locations: Congressman Dan Lundgren and the board of supervisors from Plumas, Lassen, Butte, Modoc, Sierra and Tehama counties.

Plumas
Ah ain't no flatlander!
Plumas
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:02 pm

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Joe S (AK) » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:28 pm

A Sheriff is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheriff

While Police are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police


Hats off to the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office!

Joe
Wiser Mining Through Many, Many Personal Mistakes (OOPS, "Personal Learning Situations")
User avatar
Joe S (AK)
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:03 pm
Location: Alaska except for winters in Northern Idaho

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby survivorjp » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:30 pm

Ditto Joe, I have always thought that the sheriffs might be our last hope in this country since they are the highest ELECTED law enforcement with the responsiblity to uphold the constitution just as you and I did when we were in the military. The sheriff can deny entrance into their respective counties by unelected law enforcement if the have to in order to protect the citizens against such unconstitutional actions like these f.service types, they harass and make up sh-t on the spur of the moment. Were getting to the breaking point soon anyway so "Let's get ready to RUMBLE" as the fight anouncer yells LoL
survivorjp
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:56 am
Location: Smithfield NC

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby russau » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:41 am

as events get stired up in the middel east, i just wonder if something like what happened in Egypt could/would happen here in the US? to me,everything is pointing in that direction!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Hoser John » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:35 am

:evil: What we need in 2011 is another 1776 :twisted: Kudos to the sheriff and the boyz. Where does this enviro insanity end as nothing but revenue raising as fines support the bloated agencies coffers ??-John
Hoser John
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:42 am
Location: Redding Kalif

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Reno badboy » Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:19 pm

FINALLY!! A little common sence, who woulda thunk it!?!? Now iffin' some of these same guys would side with us on dredging!!! I have been saying there's gonna be an uprising for years!!! Let's go!!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Reno badboy
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:54 pm

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Ornery Cuss » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:49 pm

As Reno bb says,

Finally authority with some common sence....That is refreshing, maybe there is hope out there.


OC
So much river...So little time
User avatar
Ornery Cuss
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby ROKONRANDY1 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:52 pm

common sence would say that a self starter would make the effort to meet with the local sheriff and ask for protection from the fed while dredging in the local streams and river. Every one has a local sheriff. rokonrandy
ROKONRANDY1
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:36 am

Re: Sheriff refuses to enforce USFS. OHV./TMP. plan

Postby Chace » Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:36 am

And this is coming out of Californi...? Wow! I'm impressed! :lol:
Chace
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Canon City, Colorado


Return to General Prospecting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests