F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Politically oriented information, blasts, kudo's for politician’s (probably won't be many of those)

Moderators: russau, Leonard

F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby CalGoldDredger » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:58 am

Sometimes this Happens... http://www.agalert.com/story/?id=3665 :lol: :lol: :lol:
CalGoldDredger
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Hell, if I don't change my ways !!!!!

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby russau » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:01 am

fourtunatly, they see whats been going on in Cal. politics, and decided todo something about it! i guess thats what happens when something is flawed and someone with commonsense does something about it this time! and maybe this is a start to turning it around???
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby pickaxe » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:58 pm

That Ag group needs to be disabused of the "notion" that we are a recreational group. It's widely known that miners have a pretty good knowledge of thier rights, does the Ag group know this? Some outdoor groups keep us at a distance but serious water rights users may take our abilities to protect our rights seriously. A meeting of minds? May have been tried already, just sayin....
pickaxe
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:26 am

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby russau » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:02 pm

trevor we are our worst own enemys! even the GPAA and Steve Hershback calls themselves "recreational". guys on the net do the same even though it has been pointed out to them to stop using this word! some want to argue about it!some will never learn!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby gremlin » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:59 pm

time to start having some fun. i figure all the large city's in cal use way to much water from mountains. a good ideal would be to make them in stall water desalt plants up and down the coast. this will free up a lot of water thats been deverted for the fish and trees.
save a tree, eat a squirrel.
gremlin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby russau » Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:16 pm

i cant understand why the desalenazation plants havent been built in the first place!all up and down the coast this water is there for the takeing! there wouldnt be a state on any coast needing water ever!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby dickb » Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:22 pm

One word Russ:

COST It costs a whole lot more to desalinate water than pipe it down from the mountains and filter and treat it.

Dickb
78 Retired and Free
Eastern Iowa
User avatar
dickb
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:27 am
Location: E. Iowa

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby gremlin » Wed Dec 28, 2011 3:35 am

dickb wrote:One word Russ:

COST It costs a whole lot more to desalinate water than pipe it down from the mountains and filter and treat it.

Dickb


not only that they suck the power. that means the state would need more power plants. then there is the high salt water that must be flushed out of the system. most plants flush it far out to sea, and let the curents spread it back in to the sea.
save a tree, eat a squirrel.
gremlin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: F' The Cal Water Control Board EPA BS .....

Postby russau » Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:31 am

gremlin wrote:
dickb wrote:One word Russ:

COST It costs a whole lot more to desalinate water than pipe it down from the mountains and filter and treat it.

Dickb


not only that they suck the power. that means the state would need more power plants. then there is the high salt water that must be flushed out of the system. most plants flush it far out to sea, and let the curents spread it back in to the sea.

yep but when your haveing a hard time getting water(lots of users) then the cost dosent seem so bad to have all you need for a city! freash water is getting tobe a commodity that could end up being as costly as gold when you have a limited supply of it!
russau
 
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:17 am
Location: St. Louis Missouri


Return to Political

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest